What they didn't notice Wolfowitz say
As debate continues over what Deputy Defense Secretary Wolfowitz actually said in a Vanity Fair interview about the administration's highlighting of WMDs in Iraq, here are a few links that might be of interest. The Pentagon has published this transcript of what Wolfowitz said; the New Republic has this analysis of the exchange; Glenn Reynolds has this take on the thing, with more links; and Fred Kaplan in Slate deconstructs the whole weapons imbroglio
Meanwhile, George W. Bush doesn't see a problem. Of course the U.S. has evidence of Iraq's WMD program, he told Polish television, and the Washington Post reports this exchange with his interviewers:
"You remember when [Secretary of State] Colin Powell stood up in front of the world, and he said Iraq has got laboratories, mobile labs to build biological weapons," Bush said in an interview before leaving today on a seven-day trip to Europe and the Middle East. "They're illegal. They're against the United Nations resolutions, and we've so far discovered two."
From my perspective, a more interesting passage in the Wolfowitz Vanity Fair interview is the one where he says:
There are a lot of things that are different now, and one that has gone by almost unnoticed--but it's huge--is that by complete mutual agreement between the U.S. and the Saudi government we can now remove almost all of our forces from Saudi Arabia. Their presence there over the last 12 years has been a source of enormous difficulty for a friendly government. It's been a huge recruiting device for al Qaeda. In fact if you look at bin Laden, one of his principle grievances was the presence of so-called crusader forces on the holy land, Mecca and Medina. I think just lifting that burden from the Saudis is itself going to open the door to other positive things.
What we see here is Wolfowitz buying into the utterly ridiculous argument that Bin Laden reacts to incentives, when it was perfectly clear from the Riyadh attacks a few weeks ago (which came after the Bush administration announced its military withdrawal) that whatever the U.S. does, Al-Qaida will not cease its anti-American operations. Very odd to see a senior official implicitly discussing carrots and sticks when addressing Al-Qaida, when the thrust of administration thinking on the matter since Sept. 11 has gone in a completely different direction.
FREE MINDS FOR THE MIDDLE EAST
Saturday, May 31, 2003
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(309)
-
▼
May
(36)
- The perils of Karim For those still interested in ...
- What they didn't notice Wolfowitz say As debate co...
- Converting Iraq? Tim Cavanaugh at Reason has put o...
- Landing Salam Pax Salam Pax exists and just to pro...
- Chalabi's patsies? Over at Slate, Jack Shafer is c...
- Narcissism at Hizbullah I have written a highly cr...
- A firing at Al-Jazeera Recently, the Iraqi Nationa...
- Qassim's rebirth Fascinating story in today's Al-H...
- Young on the poverty of Arab intellectuals Chuck's...
- Ibrahim Hamidi freed? I've just received an SMS me...
- Freund on Israeli individuation Last weekend, Mich...
- Beirut's Daily Star has failed to post Saturday co...
- [Resume] Perhaps military doctrine dictates otherw...
- [Resume] Given these various agendas, what is the ...
- Playing with Hizbullah My friend Anthony Mills has...
- Several people have told me (and I've noticed) tha...
- Robin Wright has an article in today's Los Angeles...
- The plots thicken In an earlier posting during the...
- Did Fisk rip me off? I was amused to read on Andre...
- Young on the American example There is little I ca...
- Freund on letting Arabs choose an identity Chuck ...
- Pope Petraeus Readers might find this article from...
- Khatami does Beirut Iranian president Muhammad Kha...
- As a follow up to an earlier posting a few days ag...
- Perceptive readers will notice that this link come...
- Arabists and Christians Have just finished, sever...
- Bashar concedes There has been much interest in re...
- A busy week has meant relatively few postings to B...
- Round 2: Young on saving Pan-Arabism Much of what ...
- Freund-Young Round 2: Iraq's liberal urges (Becau...
- I'm less interested in what a figure like Al Qasse...
- Powell and Syria A spot analysis of Colin Powell's...
- Neoconspiracy Here is a useful, if ultimately unsa...
- Back in business. Readers might want to waste a co...
- Garner sticks it in This from a New York Times sto...
- BC will be off the air for three days as I'll be o...
-
▼
May
(36)
No comments:
Post a Comment