[Resume] Perhaps military doctrine dictates otherwise. In much the same way as the army cannot be deployed on the border with Israel, our officers have possibly deemed entry into Ain al-Hilweh (which incidentally harbor the killers of several of their military intelligence comrades) as strategically imprudent. Or, there could be other reasons that are more complicated.
For elucidation we should look at the perennial rivalry between Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and Syria. Though such things aren’t publicized, it is Syria’s yearning to deliver Lebanon’s Palestinians to an overall regional settlement. As Damascus contemplates its depleted hand, it still has some cards to play in Lebanon, one of them its control over the refugee camps in Beirut, Tripoli and the Biqaa. With the Rashidiyyeh camp in Tyre under Arafat’s influence, Ain al-Hilweh has become the main battleground between Syria and the Palestinian leader.
This raises another question: If the Syrians want to undermine Arafat, why not just send Lebanese units into Ain al-Hilweh to liquidate his men? One reason is that the Palestinians would unite against the army, since all their factions agree on the need to preserve the political and military autonomy of the camps. What would ensue is a veritable bloodbath, forcing the Lebanese to police a hostile and impoverished environment for years. Isn’t it better, many argue, to simply contain the Palestinians in the camp, even if it means letting them kill each other?
There is another reason. An unstable Ain al-Hilweh usefully reminds outside countries that the Syrian presence in Lebanon is necessary, particularly if the camp is home to Al Qaida-linked Islamists. It is also a source of manpower for anti-Israeli operations if Syria requires such military leverage. For example the cross-border attacks by Palestinians against Israel in April 2002 were, arguably, Syria’s way of expressing displeasure with the Saudi initiative adopted a few days earlier at the Beirut Arab League summit, which Syria was annoyed with. [Continued]
FREE MINDS FOR THE MIDDLE EAST
Saturday, May 24, 2003
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(309)
-
▼
May
(36)
- The perils of Karim For those still interested in ...
- What they didn't notice Wolfowitz say As debate co...
- Converting Iraq? Tim Cavanaugh at Reason has put o...
- Landing Salam Pax Salam Pax exists and just to pro...
- Chalabi's patsies? Over at Slate, Jack Shafer is c...
- Narcissism at Hizbullah I have written a highly cr...
- A firing at Al-Jazeera Recently, the Iraqi Nationa...
- Qassim's rebirth Fascinating story in today's Al-H...
- Young on the poverty of Arab intellectuals Chuck's...
- Ibrahim Hamidi freed? I've just received an SMS me...
- Freund on Israeli individuation Last weekend, Mich...
- Beirut's Daily Star has failed to post Saturday co...
- [Resume] Perhaps military doctrine dictates otherw...
- [Resume] Given these various agendas, what is the ...
- Playing with Hizbullah My friend Anthony Mills has...
- Several people have told me (and I've noticed) tha...
- Robin Wright has an article in today's Los Angeles...
- The plots thicken In an earlier posting during the...
- Did Fisk rip me off? I was amused to read on Andre...
- Young on the American example There is little I ca...
- Freund on letting Arabs choose an identity Chuck ...
- Pope Petraeus Readers might find this article from...
- Khatami does Beirut Iranian president Muhammad Kha...
- As a follow up to an earlier posting a few days ag...
- Perceptive readers will notice that this link come...
- Arabists and Christians Have just finished, sever...
- Bashar concedes There has been much interest in re...
- A busy week has meant relatively few postings to B...
- Round 2: Young on saving Pan-Arabism Much of what ...
- Freund-Young Round 2: Iraq's liberal urges (Becau...
- I'm less interested in what a figure like Al Qasse...
- Powell and Syria A spot analysis of Colin Powell's...
- Neoconspiracy Here is a useful, if ultimately unsa...
- Back in business. Readers might want to waste a co...
- Garner sticks it in This from a New York Times sto...
- BC will be off the air for three days as I'll be o...
-
▼
May
(36)
No comments:
Post a Comment