No evidence yet that King Fahd has died, so the previous posting may have to be discounted. One clarification, though: because of their differences, the king's brothers and Abdullah essentially agreed to maintain him on his throne, though they could very well have deposed him, as was done when King Saud was replaced by King Faysal. In not doing so, they were preserving the status quo, much like the Chinese leadership did when Deng Tsio Ping was senile but was still referred to as a paramount leader.
FREE MINDS FOR THE MIDDLE EAST
Saturday, June 07, 2003
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(309)
-
▼
June
(20)
- Some of you might have arrived at BC through this ...
- Alive and still dying Sunday's issue of The Observ...
- Laborious party The line of the month from Israeli...
- Apologies to readers for the delay in posting mate...
- Not called soccer here Will take a rest from polit...
- *** Nick Hornby's Fever Pitch. Another one as yet ...
- My thoughts on the "road map" and the recent poll ...
- Blix fires away Hans Blix uses the "B" word in a G...
- Debka on Syria Debka File, which usually doubles a...
- Bush on Rantisi The White House has reacted this w...
- Bush's problem with Sharon An interesting article ...
- Targeting Rantisi Israel today tried to assassinat...
- No "road map' for Lebanon Here is an op-ed I wrote...
- Miller's crossing? After being one of the leading ...
- No evidence yet that King Fahd has died, so the pr...
- Is King Fahd dead? There is no evidence that he is...
- Chuck Freund, who charitably contributes to this b...
- A number of readers probably linked to this site t...
- Young on ... that other blogger Here is Chuck rais...
- Freund on Abdel Karim Qassim On Tuesday, May 27th,...
-
▼
June
(20)
No comments:
Post a Comment